{"id":3648,"date":"2026-08-25T01:32:01","date_gmt":"2026-08-25T01:32:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/?p=3648"},"modified":"2026-08-31T06:48:54","modified_gmt":"2026-08-31T06:48:54","slug":"what-certifications-do-ev-chargers-need","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/blog\/what-certifications-do-ev-chargers-need\/","title":{"rendered":"EV Charger Certifications: A Market-Access Guide for Importers and Buyers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- Title: EV Charger Certifications: A Market-Access Guide for Importers and Buyers --><br \/>\n<!-- Slug: what-certifications-do-ev-chargers-need --><br \/>\n<!-- Meta description: Understand EV charger certifications, CE marking, CB Scheme evidence, UL scope, EMC, radio and installation requirements before importing or procuring chargers. --><\/p>\n<article>\n<p>When a procurement manager in Rotterdam encountered a held container of DC chargers, she initially assumed the factory had forgotten a certificate. She had approved the order after comparing a sales certificate with a product brochure, then instructed the forwarder to deliver to an EPC project. At inspection, the rapid failure was visible: the certificate named a base model, while the shipped configuration used a different connector, communications module and enclosure arrangement. The reversal was important. The problem was not a missing logo or necessarily unsafe hardware; it was a market-route and configuration-control failure. No one had defined which evidence applied to the exact bill of materials, destination market and installation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Summary:<\/strong> <strong>EV charger certifications<\/strong> are not a single document. Buyers should first lock the destination market, exact configured model, intended use and local installation route; then map applicable standards, declarations, test reports, third-party certificates and market marks. In the EU, CE marking follows a conformity-assessment route and creates manufacturer responsibilities\u2014it is not a certificate issued by \u201cEurope.\u201d The IECEE CB Scheme can help transfer test results between participating certification bodies, but it is not universal market authorization. Make evidence traceable to the model, revision and accessories before shipment.<\/p>\n<nav aria-label=\"Table of contents\">\n<h2>Contents<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"#why-market-route\">Why market route comes before paperwork<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#evidence-stack\">How to read the evidence stack<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#market-matrix\">Market and buyer-verification matrix<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#project-controls\">Project controls, acceptance and installation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#procurement\">A procurement checklist for configured equipment<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#faq\">Frequently asked questions<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/nav>\n<h2 id=\"why-market-route\">Why market route comes before paperwork<\/h2>\n<p>Importers often ask, \u201cWhich certification does an EV charger need?\u201d The useful answer begins with four questions: Where will the unit be placed on the market? What exact product is being supplied? Who is legally responsible for placing it on that market? How will it be installed and connected? A 7 kW wallbox for a workplace, a 240 kW public DC charger, and an OEM controller shipped to an integrator may use overlapping technical standards but take different compliance routes and carry different documentation responsibilities.<\/p>\n<p>A standard is a technical document: it can describe safety, connector geometry, electromagnetic disturbance, communications or test methods. It is not, by itself, a certification. A laboratory test report is evidence of the samples and conditions tested. A third-party certificate is a decision by a named certification body under a defined scheme and scope. A manufacturer declaration assigns responsibility for stated conformity. A market mark can be a regulatory marking, voluntary scheme mark, or a mark associated with a particular jurisdiction. Treating those items as interchangeable creates avoidable customs, tender and liability risk.<\/p>\n<p>For conductive charging equipment, buyers commonly encounter IEC 61851 series documents for EV conductive charging systems and IEC 62196 series documents for plugs, socket-outlets, vehicle connectors and inlets. Those references can be relevant to charger design, but their relevance depends on product type, region and edition. Communications requirements can add ISO 15118 considerations; software and backend requirements can involve OCPP, which is an interoperability protocol rather than a product-safety certification. The correct standards list must come from the route and product scope, not from a generic catalogue.<\/p>\n<p>In the European Union, <strong>CE marking<\/strong> is applied by the manufacturer when the applicable EU requirements have been addressed through the required conformity-assessment procedure. Depending on the product and functions, relevant legislation may include electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, radio equipment and restrictions on hazardous substances. The technical documentation, risk assessment, declaration and marking must match the product placed on the market. A distributor or importer has distinct obligations under applicable law; obtain legal advice for the country and role rather than relying on a seller&#8217;s shorthand claim.<\/p>\n<p>Configuration is the recurring source of error. A change to AC input, output power, connector family, cable assembly, RFID reader, cellular modem, payment terminal, enclosure material, cooling design or firmware can alter the evidence needed, its validity, or its interpretation. Create a controlled configuration record before issuing a purchase order. It should include model number, hardware revision, software version, ratings label artwork, connector and cable part numbers, market package, drawings, manuals and the documents claimed to cover that package. If a supplier cannot link the evidence to that record, flag the item for review.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"evidence-stack\">How to read the evidence stack without confusing scope<\/h2>\n<p>Start from the intended destination, not a certificate library. For a product sold into the EU, document the applicable legal acts and harmonised or other technical specifications used to support the assessment. For a project in the United States or Canada, the authority having jurisdiction, local electrical code and utility or customer requirements can determine whether a specified third-party certification mark and installation approval are needed. For other markets, national conformity schemes, electrical approvals, radio approvals and labelling rules may apply. The route can vary even within a country by product category and installation context.<\/p>\n<p>The IECEE <strong>CB Scheme<\/strong> is an international system for mutual recognition of product-safety test reports and certificates among participating national certification bodies. A CB Test Certificate and CB Test Report can reduce duplicate testing in a participating destination, but national differences, local deviations, additional reports and a local certificate may still be necessary. It does not grant universal permission to sell, install or connect a charger. Ask which national certification body will accept the report, what deviations apply, and whether the exact product family is listed.<\/p>\n<p>UL is a certification organization whose marks and product certifications apply to specified products, categories and jurisdictions. A buyer should not treat the word \u201cUL\u201d on a quotation as a blanket authorization for every charger or project. Verify the exact marking, product category, model designation and listing or certification record through the relevant UL resources; then compare it with the delivered nameplate. A US project may also require field evaluation, utility approval, local permits or other conditions outside the product certification scope.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EMC compliance<\/strong> needs separate attention because an EV charger is a power-electronic product and may contain communications functions. Electromagnetic compatibility requirements cover emissions and immunity in defined conditions; radio equipment can add a distinct regulatory route for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular or other transmitters. A DC charger that passes a safety evaluation is not automatically covered for every radio module, antenna position, firmware region setting or installation environment. Require reports and declarations that identify the product, configuration, standards, test laboratory and any limitations.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Evidence item<\/th>\n<th>What it normally demonstrates<\/th>\n<th>What it does not demonstrate by itself<\/th>\n<th>Buyer check<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Technical standard reference<\/td>\n<td>Design or test framework selected for a product function<\/td>\n<td>Certification, market authorization or exact-model coverage<\/td>\n<td>Check edition, clauses, intended product type and market relevance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Laboratory test report<\/td>\n<td>Results for identified samples under stated conditions<\/td>\n<td>That all production units or accessories match the sample<\/td>\n<td>Match report model, revision, photos, ratings and test deviations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Third-party certificate<\/td>\n<td>Scheme decision within a stated scope and validity conditions<\/td>\n<td>Universal acceptance in other markets<\/td>\n<td>Verify issuer, database record, scope, factory\/site and model list<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Declaration of conformity<\/td>\n<td>Manufacturer&#8217;s formal responsibility for stated applicable requirements<\/td>\n<td>Independent testing of every feature or automatic legal sufficiency<\/td>\n<td>Check responsible entity, product ID, legal route, date and signature<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Market mark<\/td>\n<td>Marking required or recognized under a particular regime or scheme<\/td>\n<td>That the whole installation, software stack or local permit is approved<\/td>\n<td>Inspect label, documentation and destination-market requirements together<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Evidence quality is partly a traceability question. Insist that document identifiers are stable and revision-controlled, that reports name the relevant manufacturer or applicant, and that translations preserve technical meaning. Retain an index with links to the source documents and a note on who checked each item. A copied PDF with a familiar logo but no accessible scope, date, or model linkage should not decide an import or bid.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"market-matrix\">Market and buyer-verification matrix<\/h2>\n<p>The following matrix is a procurement planning tool, not legal advice or a substitute for national requirements. Confirm current rules with qualified local advisers, the relevant authority, customer and installer. The destination, product configuration and local installation control scope must be documented together.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Market or route<\/th>\n<th>Typical evidence focus<\/th>\n<th>Standards\/evidence considerations<\/th>\n<th>Buyer verification before shipment<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>European Union \/ EEA route<\/td>\n<td>Applicable EU conformity assessment, technical file and declaration<\/td>\n<td>Electrical safety, EMC, radio and RoHS routes may each be relevant; CE is a manufacturer marking under applicable rules<\/td>\n<td>Map directives\/regulations to functions; compare declaration and label to exact configuration; retain technical-documentation contact<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>United Kingdom route<\/td>\n<td>Applicable UK product route and local deployment obligations<\/td>\n<td>Requirements and recognition arrangements can differ from EU route; radio and electrical requirements may need separate review<\/td>\n<td>Confirm current UK market requirements, responsible person role, labels and project specifications<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>United States project route<\/td>\n<td>Specified product certification plus AHJ, code and utility acceptance<\/td>\n<td>UL certification may be requested for defined equipment; state\/local rules and site permits remain relevant<\/td>\n<td>Check exact listing\/certification scope, local electrical code, utility interconnection and installer plan<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Canada project route<\/td>\n<td>Provincial\/territorial installation and acceptable certification route<\/td>\n<td>Equipment approval and local electrical inspection can be determinative; do not assume a US document transfers unchanged<\/td>\n<td>Confirm authority and installer requirements, marks accepted, field-evaluation needs and French\/English label needs where applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Other national import route<\/td>\n<td>National approvals, customs documentation and radio\/electrical rules<\/td>\n<td>IEC or CB evidence may support a local application but local deviations can apply<\/td>\n<td>Obtain the local route in writing; identify local certificate holder, sample requirements and lead time before production<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>For an EPC, the market matrix should flow into the submittal register. Include single-line diagrams, fault-current assumptions, grounding approach, cable sizing, protective devices, environmental rating, foundation and bollard drawings, fire strategy, network topology and commissioning method. Product evidence supports the equipment; it does not automatically approve the site design. Utilities can impose connection capacity, metering, demand response, export-control or communications conditions that a factory certificate cannot answer.<\/p>\n<p>For an OEM or ODM buyer, control the brand and variant boundary. Determine who owns the technical file, who may change firmware, whether a private-label model number is captured by the evidence, and when a new assessment is triggered. A contract should require notification before any component substitution affecting safety, EMC, radio, ratings or enclosure. Sample approval alone is weak if production change control is undefined.<\/p>\n<figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/DC240-In-Parking-1024x576.webp\" alt=\"High-power DC EV chargers installed in a commercial parking and fleet application\"><figcaption>Product evidence must be paired with site-specific electrical design, traffic management and commissioning controls.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 id=\"project-controls\">Project controls, acceptance and installation are separate workstreams<\/h2>\n<p>Market access begins before the purchase order and continues through commissioning. Put the evidence requirements in the technical specification, then give each a measurable acceptance criterion. \u201cCertificates included\u201d is too vague. Better language identifies the destination, applicable route, exact model family, accepted issuing body where relevant, required date, language, public database or verification method, and the right to reject undocumented substitutions.<\/p>\n<p>Use a document gate before production release. The supplier submits a configuration baseline, ratings label, declaration where applicable, certificates and test reports, manuals, wiring drawings, bills of materials for critical components, software and radio-module information, and packing labels. The buyer checks consistency rather than merely collecting files. For example, a report may cover 32 A input while the ordered model is 63 A; a radio report may cover a module but not the installed antenna; a certificate may cover a cabinet while the delivered dispenser has different cable hardware.<\/p>\n<p>Factory acceptance testing should address what the buyer has specified: safety functions, connector locking, emergency stop, insulation or protective-earth checks as appropriate, display and authentication behaviour, meter or energy-data interface, communications recovery, alarms, output limits and configuration identification. The test plan should state methods, instruments, acceptance limits and witness records. It does not replace an accredited certification assessment, electrical inspection or local commissioning requirement.<\/p>\n<p>At site acceptance, an installer and project team must review placement, clearances, foundations, cable protection, earthing, protective devices, accessible routes, signage, ventilation, emergency response and network operation. Local fire, accessibility, building, metrology and grid rules may have their own scope. The charger may be compliant as a product yet unsuitable at a particular location because of flood exposure, accessible-path obstruction, insufficient fault rating or incompatible supply arrangement.<\/p>\n<p>For equipment with cloud connectivity, include cybersecurity and data controls. Identify software update authority, credential lifecycle, remote-access roles, encryption expectations, vulnerability notification and incident contacts. These are commercial and operational controls, but some tender or sector requirements may make them contractual. ISO 15118 can be relevant to vehicle-charger communications; this <a href=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/blog\/iso-15118-ev-charger-explain\/\">ISO 15118 EV charger explanation<\/a> provides useful technical context, but support should be verified at the vehicle, charger, backend and configuration level.<\/p>\n<p>Commissioning records should identify the exact installed asset, not only the project. Capture serial number, location, circuit reference, firmware version, communications identifier, installer, energization date and the tests completed. Tie later maintenance changes back to that record. This gives an importer or fleet owner a defensible way to determine whether a service issue affects one installation, a product revision or the original specification.<\/p>\n<figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/EV-Chargers-in-Shenzhen-Charging-Station.webp\" alt=\"EV chargers operating at a managed public charging station in Shenzhen\"><figcaption>Installation, maintenance access, grid connection and backend configuration remain site responsibilities beyond product documentation.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Electromagnetic performance deserves a deliberate project acceptance step. Cable routing, grounding, nearby equipment, wireless coverage and power quality can affect the system after it leaves the laboratory. Review the <a href=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/blog\/ev-charger-emc-requirements-project-acceptance\/\">EV charger EMC requirements and project acceptance<\/a> guide alongside the project-specific test plan. It helps translate abstract report references into commissioning questions without representing a report as a universal approval.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"procurement\">A procurement checklist for configured equipment<\/h2>\n<p>Build the RFQ around the evidence chain. First, name the destination countries and first installation locations. Second, state supply voltage, output power, connector, cable length, enclosure, metering, payment, RFID, cellular\/Wi-Fi, language, firmware and branding options. Third, identify the legal entity that will place the product on the market, import it and install it. These inputs prevent a factory from responding with a generic certification bundle that cannot be reconciled later.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Lock the model baseline.<\/strong> Create a buyer-controlled configuration sheet and require its identifier on the quotation, factory test record, shipment list and evidence index.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Map markets separately.<\/strong> Keep an evidence matrix by country rather than a single \u201cglobal certification\u201d column; record local deviations and installation prerequisites.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Verify primary sources.<\/strong> Check certificate databases or issuer confirmation when available, then reconcile product nameplate, report photos and serial-number scheme.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Separate product and site acceptance.<\/strong> Plan factory tests, delivery inspection, installation inspection, energization and operational commissioning as distinct gates.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Control changes.<\/strong> Require advance approval for substitutions and preserve documents for the product&#8217;s expected service and warranty records.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>A <strong>market-access documentation<\/strong> package should be readable by customs, an EPC reviewer, an installer and an internal quality team. That means a short index, stable file names, current revisions, product photographs, label samples and a plain-language scope note. It should say what the evidence covers and what remains for the importer, local representative, installer or authority. Ambiguity in this handover is a costly form of technical debt.<\/p>\n<h3>Build an evidence register that survives handover<\/h3>\n<p>Use a register rather than an unstructured folder. Each row should identify the configured model, document type, issuing organization, document number, revision, issue date, expiry or surveillance condition if applicable, destination market, applicable function, storage location and verifier. Add columns for nameplate wording, factory location, critical components and open questions. The register becomes the common language between purchasing, quality, engineering, logistics and the local installer; it also makes it possible to see, before shipment, whether one late document blocks a whole batch.<\/p>\n<p>Include a \u201ccoverage decision\u201d column with only three states: covered, conditional, or not yet demonstrated. Conditional can mean the evidence is relevant but needs a local deviation review, a revised declaration, a different label or confirmation of a radio module. Do not quietly convert conditional into covered because the delivery date is close. Escalate the decision to the person who owns market release, and retain the rationale. A controlled exception is safer than an undocumented assumption.<\/p>\n<p>Serial-number traceability is equally useful. Agree how the manufacturing date, hardware revision and firmware baseline can be read from the charger or production record. At inbound inspection, photograph the nameplate, connector, enclosure and carton label for a sample from every shipment; compare these against the controlled configuration sheet. This is not a substitute for a conformity assessment, but it detects the ordinary mistakes that cause evidence mismatch: a wrong cable, a substitute modem, a different breaker rating, a country plug variant or a label printed for another market.<\/p>\n<h3>Assess changes by function, not by sales description<\/h3>\n<p>Suppliers may describe a revision as \u201ccosmetic\u201d because the cabinet looks unchanged. Buyers should assess function instead. A different display may introduce a radio interface; a new payment reader can change data and power requirements; a longer cable can affect mechanical and thermal conditions; a revised connector can change interoperability; a firmware change can affect charging controls, cybersecurity or metering behaviour. Ask the technical owner to document why a change does or does not affect the evidence route. Where a scheme certificate or declaration is involved, confirm the required action with the responsible manufacturer or certification body rather than inferring it from the product&#8217;s appearance.<\/p>\n<p>For distributors, this discipline protects downstream claims. Marketing copy should repeat the exact scope of verified evidence, avoid broad phrases such as \u201capproved worldwide,\u201d and separate product statements from site-installation services. Sales teams should have an escalation path for a customer requesting an unfamiliar country, vehicle interface, tariff meter or payment function. It is much cheaper to pause a quotation for a scope check than to relabel inventory, repeat a test or explain a held shipment.<\/p>\n<p>In practical terms, a complete <strong>EV charger certifications<\/strong> review is a release process: identify the market route, freeze the configuration, verify documents and marks, test agreed functions, and hand the installer the records required for the site. The result is not a promise of legal approval in every jurisdiction; it is a disciplined basis for obtaining the approvals and project acceptance that the chosen market actually requires.<\/p>\n<p>Commercially, do not compare suppliers on unit price alone. A low-priced unit that requires late re-testing, certificate transfer, a field evaluation, custom label rework or a second commissioning visit can change the total procurement cost. Conversely, a large folder of unrelated certificates is not value. Evaluate response time to evidence questions, configuration discipline, document revision control, availability of manuals and drawings, and willingness to expose scope limitations early.<\/p>\n<p>XYDF\/Xinya EE may be included in a sourcing comparison where buyers need EV charging equipment and project documentation aligned to a defined specification. The prudent approach is the same for every supplier: request configuration-specific evidence, verify its scope independently, and confirm local market and installation obligations with qualified parties. For a broader buying framework, use this <a href=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/blog\/ev-charger-procurement-guide\/\">compliance-focused EV charger procurement guide<\/a>; for EU route context, see <a href=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/blog\/ev-charger-compliance-requirements-in-europe\/\"><strong>EV charger compliance<\/strong> requirements in Europe<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"faq\">Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Are standards and certificates the same thing?<\/h3>\n<p>No. A standard gives technical requirements or test methods; a certificate is issued under a defined scheme and scope, while a declaration assigns manufacturer responsibility. Buyers should check the exact relationship between the document, model and market rather than asking only whether a standard name appears.<\/p>\n<h3>Does CE marking mean an EV charger is certified by the EU?<\/h3>\n<p>No. CE marking is associated with applicable EU conformity-assessment requirements and the manufacturer&#8217;s responsibilities; it is not a universal EU-issued product certificate. The applicable legal acts, technical documentation, declaration and product configuration still need review.<\/p>\n<h3>Will a CB certificate allow an EV charger to be sold anywhere?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The CB Scheme can support transfer of safety test results among participating national certification bodies. National differences, local certification, electrical approval, radio rules and installation requirements may still apply.<\/p>\n<h3>Does UL cover every model from a charger manufacturer?<\/h3>\n<p>No. UL certification or listing applies to specified products and scope. Verify the exact model, category and marking through the appropriate UL information, then compare it with the shipment and project specification.<\/p>\n<h3>Do Wi-Fi and cellular features require separate review?<\/h3>\n<p>They can. Radio functionality may introduce separate regulatory requirements, and the approved module, antenna, firmware region and host configuration can matter. Treat communications compliance as a distinct line in the evidence matrix.<\/p>\n<h3>What must an EPC verify beyond product documents?<\/h3>\n<p>An EPC must also address supply capacity, protection coordination, earthing, civil works, accessibility, fire and building requirements, utility conditions and commissioning. Product evidence is necessary but cannot approve a particular installation on its own.<\/p>\n<h2>Authoritative references<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu\/single-market\/ce-marking_en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">European Commission: CE marking<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/webgate.ec.europa.eu\/single-market-compliance-space\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">European Commission: product compliance and market surveillance information<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iecee.org\/certification\/iec-system-of-conformity-assessment-schemes-for-electrotechnical-equipment-and-components-ie\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">IECEE: CB Scheme information<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a >UL Solutions: product certification<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iec.ch\/homepage\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC standards information<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The enduring rule is straightforward: evidence has value only when it follows the exact product, market and installation decision. Before you release a purchase order, turn the requirement into a traceable matrix; before you release a shipment, reconcile the matrix to the delivered configuration.<\/p>\n<p>When your route and specification are defined, compare the configured equipment, drawings and documentation package with <a href=\"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/products\/\"><strong>EV charger certifications<\/strong>-ready product sourcing options<\/a> from XYDF\/Xinya EE, and ask for a scope-based review rather than a generic certificate list.<\/p>\n<\/article>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When a procurement manager in Rotterdam encountered a held container of DC chargers, she initially assumed the factory had forgotten a certificate. She had approved the order after comparing a sales certificate with a product brochure, then instructed the forwarder to deliver to an EPC project. At inspection, the rapid failure was visible: the certificate [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":3722,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,24],"tags":[],"product-features":[],"class_list":["post-3648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3648"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4184,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3648\/revisions\/4184"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3648"},{"taxonomy":"xinya_product_feature","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xinya-ee.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product-features?post=3648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}